Effectiveness of communications in enhancing adherence to public health behavioural interventions: a COVID-19 evidence review

This review examined how communication affected public adherence to COVID-19 safety measures (like distancing, mask use, testing, and staying home) in the UK. Overall, adherence was generally high, but communication quality made a difference. Clear, consistent messages improved compliance, while mixed or confusing guidance reduced it. Trust in government and health authorities was strongly linked to better adherence. Messages that supported autonomy (explaining why actions matter) worked better than overly controlling language. The review recommends using trusted messengers, avoiding conflicting information, and balancing authority with respect to strengthen compliance in future public health emergencies

Date published:
August 24, 2023
Citatation:
Williams, S. N., Dienes, K., Jaheed, J., Wardman, J. K., & Petts, J. (2023). Effectiveness of communications in enhancing adherence to public health behavioural interventions: A COVID-19 evidence review. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 381(2257), 20230129.

Evidence At A Glance


Study Type:
Systematic review and/or meta-analysis
Study Design:
Systematic review
Study Outcomes:
Program evaluation/quality improvement

Target Population:
General public, Governmental public health workforce
Disaster Type:
Infectious disease outbreak
Intervention Target Level:
Individual level

Intervention Area:

Countermeasures & mitigation:
  • Non-pharmaceutical interventions
Information management:
  • Emergency public information & warning
Effective Intervention
Yes