Case Managers in Mass Casualty Incidents

This study examined whether assigning “case managers” to each patient during mass casualty incidents (MCIs) improves care and efficiency. Instead of handing patients off between different teams at each treatment area, one dedicated team followed each patient from arrival through diagnosis and treatment. The change did not require more staff and did not increase mortality. However, it reduced delays to surgery and imaging, decreased unnecessary tests, and shortened hospital stays for severely injured patients. Staff reported better communication and clearer responsibility. The study suggests case managers improve surge capacity by increasing efficiency, coordination, and continuity of care.

Date published:
March 1, 2009
Citatation:
Einav, S., Schecter, W. P., Matot, I., Horn, J. K., Hersch, M., Reissman, P., & Spira, R. M. (2009). Case Managers in Mass Casualty Incidents. Annals of Surgery, 249(3), 496–501. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819a6f17

Evidence At A Glance


Study Type:
Quantitative
Study Design:
Quasi-experimental design (interrupted time-series, regression discontinuity)
Study Outcomes:
Effectiveness

Target Population:
Clinical healthcare workers
Disaster Type:
Community unrest, Human-made disaster
Intervention Target Level:
Organizational level

Intervention Area:

Public health incident management:
  • Quality improvement & standards
  • Workforce development, training & coordination
Surge management:
  • Medical surge
Effective Intervention
Yes