This study explores how behavioral science can improve wildfire risk mitigation programs by changing how information is delivered to residents. A field experiment mailed letters to over 4,500 homeowners directing them to personalized risk webpages; about 12% engaged by visiting the site. Changing message types (basic, personalized, or social comparison) did not significantly change response, but engagement varied by community. The key takeaway is that simple, low-cost outreach can increase awareness, and embedding experiments into programs helps identify what works. Using data, testing outreach, and tracking engagement can make wildfire programs more effective and targeted. 

Intervention Area: