Developing Behavioral and Evidence-Based Programs for Wildfire Risk Mitigation

This study explores how behavioral science can improve wildfire risk mitigation programs by changing how information is delivered to residents. A field experiment mailed letters to over 4,500 homeowners directing them to personalized risk webpages; about 12% engaged by visiting the site. Changing message types (basic, personalized, or social comparison) did not significantly change response, but engagement varied by community. The key takeaway is that simple, low-cost outreach can increase awareness, and embedding experiments into programs helps identify what works. Using data, testing outreach, and tracking engagement can make wildfire programs more effective and targeted. 

Date published:
November 20, 2020
Citatation:
Byerly, H., Meldrum, J. R., Brenkert-Smith, H., Champ, P., Gomez, J., Falk, L., & Barth, C. (2020). Developing Behavioral and Evidence-Based Programs for Wildfire Risk Mitigation. Fire, 3(4), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire3040066

Evidence At A Glance


Study Type:
Quantitative
Study Design:
Randomized allocation study (RCT, pretest-posttest control group, factorial design)
Study Outcomes:
Effectiveness

Target Population:
General public, Rural populations
Disaster Type:
Human-made disaster, Natural disaster
Intervention Target Level:
Individual level

Intervention Area:

Information management:
  • Emergency public information & warning
Public health incident management:
  • Information & communication technology