Public Health Emergency Preparedness Exercises: Lessons Learned

Exercises improved participants’ understanding of roles and responsibilities, strengthened interagency coordination, and increased confidence in legal and operational authorities. Common system-level challenges identified included unclear leadership and incident command use, weak risk communication, limited surveillance and laboratory capacity, and inadequate surge planning. Larger and more diverse communities reported additional communication challenges. The authors emphasize that exercises should be realistic, multidisciplinary, and rigorously evaluated using reliable performance measures. Well-designed exercises can both educate responders and identify specific gaps to guide targeted preparedness improvements.

Date published:
November 1, 2010
Citatation:
Biddinger, P. D., Savoia, E., Massin-Short, S. B., Preston, J., & Stoto, M. A. (2010). Public Health Emergency Preparedness Exercises: Lessons Learned. Public Health Reports®, 125(5_suppl), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549101250S514

Evidence At A Glance


Study Type:
Mixed-methods
Study Design:
Case study
Study Outcomes:
Effectiveness improvement, Program evaluation/quality improvement

Target Population:
Clinical healthcare workers, Governmental public health workforce, Organizational leadership
Disaster Type:
All hazards
Intervention Target Level:
Multi-level

Intervention Area:

Public health incident management:
  • Operation & resources
  • Workforce development, training & coordination
Surge management:
  • Multi-sector partnerships & training